Expression of human immunodeficiency computer virus antigen (HIV-Ag) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid during acute and chronic contamination. The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra exhibited 100% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity overall, with a 99.7% specificity in low-risk individuals. The analytical sensitivity, as assessed by seroconversion panels and p24 antigen in samples, was equivalent to the sensitivity of the reference assays used to characterize these panels. The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra is usually accurate, offers potential advantages over standard HIV screening for time and cost savings, has walk-away capability, and correctly identifies both early and established HIV infections. Since 1986, a number and variety of commercial assays have been available to screen blood, diagnose contamination, and monitor disease progression in individuals infected by human immunodeficiency computer virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2). These assays are categorized in four main classes, including assessments that detect HIV antibody, detect p24 antigen, detect or quantify viral CBB1007 nucleic acids, and estimate T-lymphocyte figures (cell phenotyping) (5). The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the most common immunoassay utilized for the detection of HIV antibody and antigen. This technique has developed from the first-generation viral lysate-based immunoglobulin G (IgG) assessments, to the second-generation assessments incorporating recombinant and/or synthetic peptide antigens, to the third-generation Itgb7 assessments which detect IgG and IgM (antigen sandwich techniques), and finally to the third-generation-plus assays which also detect HIV-1 group O (5). Specific antibody to HIV is usually synthesized soon after contamination, although the precise time may depend on several factors, including both host and viral characteristics. Significantly, antibody may be present at low levels during early contamination; however, these levels may be below the minimum concentration detectable by some assays (5). Antibody is usually detected in a majority of individuals within 6 to 12 weeks after contamination with the earlier generations of assays, but antibody levels can be detected within 3 to 4 4 weeks after contamination when the newer third-generation antigen sandwich assays are used (3). This windows period can be shortened to about 2 weeks using p24 antigen assays or to 1 week with the implementation of nucleic acid detection assays (10). Consequently, the windows period between contamination and detection of contamination may be less than 2 weeks if a comprehensive screening approach is utilized (6). In addition to increased sensitivity and specificity with the incorporation of recombinant proteins and synthetic peptide antigens, the ELISA offers several advantages over other types of assays in that it is inexpensive, relatively simple, suitable for screening sizeable numbers of samples, and very easily adapted to automated platforms. Although nucleic acid screening and viral culture are highly sensitive and specific methods to identify contamination, respectively, these procedures are time-consuming, laborious, and expensive (5). The detection of p24 antigen by ELISA is usually CBB1007 a simple and cost-effective technique to demonstrate viral components in blood, thereby verifying contamination and/or identifying early contamination, and offers the same overall performance advantages as the ELISAs for antibody detection (6). The antigen assay steps viral capsid (core) p24 protein in blood usually earlier than antibody during acute contamination due to the initial burst of computer virus replication after contamination (8). In the United States, antigen screening was implemented in 1995 to product antibody screening of donated blood components and has recognized antibody-negative, HIV-contaminated models (11). Consequently, screening blood for both antibody and antigen CBB1007 results in almost 30 million assessments for the 15 million blood units donated per year in the United.